WHAT SHOULD BE THE RESUME BACKGROUND TO BE PRESIDNENT?
It’s a no brainer that the best candidate to be a restaurant manager is to have a good food service supervisory background. To work in a dog kennel, one would think that some background for the care and support of animals would be a good fit. How about a carpenter with the proper expert use of tools of the trade should be on the resume?
Before you answer, I didn’t vote for Bush Jr. But I surely did not vote for Obama based on the same criteria. Although Bush ran a state as it’s elected leader, Obama ran what? WTF is in this mans resume that made him "qualified" to sit behind the desk of the most powerful position on the planet?
If any person voted for him because he’s black, that’s absolutely idiotic! If anyone voted for him because he has a great ability to verbally communicate, equally stupid! If he received a single vote as an "anti Bush" move, that it is the biggest waste of a vote!
So why??? What’s in this man’s resume that makes him qualified as the leader of economics? What does this man have that makes him the best qualified to run a multi trillion $ corporation or economy?
What in his background that would make him a CEO of the largest business on Earth. In the real world, Bill Gates or Rubbert Murdock would qualify regardless of party affiliation. The president’s primary job is protect the country, be the country’s economical embassader to foreighn powers and sign congressional legislation that prospers the "entire" country not simple single special interests. Any one can pander, but it has no place in the white house. A competant governor who runs the economy and multi billion $$ state budget would qualify. So why Obama?
CROWN ROYAL – What web site did you get that data from? Sponge Bob.com?
DAVID H. – Two of you now comment on his resume, yet you and CROWN ROYAL can’t even come up with the same data. Clear how his supporters see diferent things on the same topic. No wonder why he got elected.
mommanuk… Is he qualified? That’s all I asked. And yes, a CEO of a multi billion $$$ successful company could be president. It is the attribute and area that the president spends most of his./her time on their entire term.
I don’t think voters took his lack of managerial experience into consideration. It appears like the Jim Jones followers who thought of him as a messiah type who would solve all their problems and lead them to the promise land. They also fell for the smooth articulate talk, but all con artists have the same ability.
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
ask the libs and blacks
References :
Funny you should mention governors as qualified, seems nobody else took that seriously, right?
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/08/30/sarah-palin-vs-barack-obama/
References :
Why?….Because he is the darling of the younger generation and other non-taxpayers who would rather stick it to the man than take the time to figure who the man really is. Plus he is part black, between that and his sound bite,,,,a winning combination for the young and the naive.
Crown Royal below, no he didn’t, my god, at least get your facts straight…not ONE thing you said is true…
References :
Just lie, that’s what got Obama elected.
References :
He graduated the top of his class at Harvard Law.
He spent five years as a Constitutional lawyer and professor.
He spent 15 years as an Illinois legislator.
He spent four years as a US senator.
References :
Intelligence, charisma, Ivy League college, US Senator….viola’! We have the right guy.
Get behind the President and quit hoping America fails.
References :
12 years of public service as senator, including 10 years in the Illinois state senate and 4 years as a US senator. What were McCain’s qualifications?
"What’s in this man’s resume that makes him qualified as the leader of economics?"
McCain admitted he knew nothing about economics.
"What in his background that would make him a CEO of the largest business on Earth."
The US Government is NOT A BUSINESS and it was never intended to be a BUSINESS.
References :
Experience, experience, experience.
References :
Very few, if any, voted for him because he was black. They voted for him because he was not Republican.
But you can go on all day about what you think the qualifications should be. There has never been a President in our history that has had all the experience that people use to justify hating Obama. Some claim military experience is a requirement, while US Grant was one of the worst presidents we’ve had. Obama may not have run a state, but he ran a couple of very large organizations, whether or not you approve of them. And according to you George Bush should have been considered qualified, since he did run a state.
The hard fact is that no one is ever qualified to be President when he takes office. There is no job comparable to the demands of the presidency. Any other "qualifications" are artificial and used to excuse not voting for someone you don’t like.
References :
I disagree, the president is a representative of the people who vote for him, and a rabbit could do his job
References :
I don’t think voters took his lack of managerial experience into consideration. It appears like the Jim Jones followers who thought of him as a messiah type who would solve all their problems and lead them to the promise land. They also fell for the smooth articulate talk, but all con artists have the same ability.
References :
the people voted him in because they wanted to be apart of history well most of the people but others actually believed all his campaign promises which most of the promises he could not full fill yes he does not have the exp. like he said "I am ready for this job on day 1" obviously he wasn’t
References :
According to a recent DEMOCRAT Presidential campaign, even a few months as Governor is better than a LIFETIME in the Senate.
That Governor is the most "President-like" job that exists is conspicuously true – which is WHY Obama supporters claim the opposite.
Of course, the core idea is that to be Chief Executive, some executive experience is a good idea since even DECADES of "non-executive" experience is completely irrelevant.
Thus, if you spent a couple years as a shift supervisor at a McDonald’s without completely cocking-it-up, Obama is STILL less qualified to be President than you are.
References :
Self-evident truth.
Nice post and all good points!
Problem is , the American people should have been in this frame of mind about 16 months ago!
The way I see it, first the American people were ’sold’, that only the Democrats can lead the country.
Then the people were ’sold’ that Bush and the Republicans created a bad economy by supporting big business/banks!
Then the ‘media’ went to work ’selling’ Obama as ‘the one’!
In effect, America was ‘bamboozled’ and ‘hoodwinked’ !
Now we have a President that can’t ‘lead’ but is a ‘great campaigner’!
Why Obama?
Well, he’s a Democrat, he talks a good line, and he’s a ‘minority’!
Sadly, that was enough!
References :
Now for the people providing years, add them up and look at Obama’s age……….This guy has never held a Job and got his Senate seat because the guy he ran against couldn’t keep his pants up. The nicest way to put it is a vote for something else, 20 years of Clinton’s and Bushes in the white House was just to much of the same ole same ole! Sad to say Him being Black helped. I wonder if Hillary would of been better At the very least Bill could of been comic relief.
References :
The only thing that qualifies a person to be president is being president. You may think being governor qualifies a person, I don’t, although some governors have made descent presidents. I think being a general is a great qualification, the best in fact, unfortunately, they rarely make good enough politicians to get the job.
In the last election, Bill Ricardson had the best resume of all 20 candidates from the 2 main parties, but he was never one of the top 6 candidates. See, for most of us, it’s not about a resume. We all have our own basis for selecting the person we vote for, but experience is just something we use to justify our choice. We spend too much time eliminating people for stupid reasons and that is more important than choosing a person for the right reasons.
When it really comes down to it though, we are trying to choose the best leader and the measure of a leader is how well they lead. In the end, the politician who gets the most voters to follow is the one who wins.
It’s probably not the best way to select our leader, but it is democracy.
References :
Community Organizers not allowed !
References :
Ones character, confidently displayed (Birth Certificate) open for inspection or observation . Knowing that this becomes intrusive should have been sufficient deterrent .
References :